Shurink vs Ultherapy Gangnam, Seoul
Shurink and Ultherapy are both focused-ultrasound lifting treatments, but they sit at different points: Shurink is the accessible Korean HIFU tier with 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm cartridges, while Ultherapy is the imported micro-focused ultrasound that shows the physician the exact layer being treated on a real-time screen — the same doctor reads your laxity depth and says plainly which one fits, just steps from Gangnam Station in Seoul.
Shurink vs Ultherapy
Shurink vs Ultherapy
Shurink vs Ultherapy · Gangnam Seoul
Shurink and Ultherapy are both focused-ultrasound lifting treatments, but they sit at different points: Shurink is the accessible Korean HIFU tier with 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm cartridges, while Ultherapy is the imported micro-focused ultrasound that shows the physician the exact layer being treated on a real-time screen — the same doctor reads your laxity depth and says plainly which one fits, just steps from Gangnam Station in Seoul.
Across RE:BERRY Clinics
30,000+ Treatments
Direct Consult & Treatment
Medical Director
Minutes from ICN Airport
Incheon AirportShurink vs Ultherapy in Gangnam — which should I choose, and how much is each?
Shurink 300 shots is ₩150,000 ($108 USD) and Ultherapy 300 shots is ₩990,000 ($707 USD) at RE:BERRY Gangnam: Shurink is the accessible Korean HIFU with 1.5/3.0/4.5mm cartridges for surface looseness and maintenance, while Ultherapy adds real-time visualization and a deeper anchor for jowl laxity — the same physician reads your depth and tells you plainly which fits.
Effects & Progress
Effects & Progress
Shurink and Ultherapy both use focused ultrasound to lift, but they differ in depth control, visualization, feel, and how long results last — which is why the choice depends on your laxity, not on price alone.
Mild redness or tenderness may appear in the treated zones and usually settles quickly. Makeup and daily life — including travel — are fine the same day with either treatment.
Early firmness from collagen contraction settles in. The skin often feels tauter to the touch before the visible lift reaches its peak, with Ultherapy's deeper anchor felt more distinctly.
The main lifting phase — new collagen builds through the treated layers and the cheeks, jowls, and jawline look progressively firmer. Response speed varies by individual and by device.
Maintenance period. Shurink results are typically maintained 6-12 months and Ultherapy 12-18 months; RE:BERRY will guide the repeat interval that suits your skin and budget.
Treatment Process
Shurink vs Ultherapy — 4 Steps to the Right Choice
※ Illustrative images are AI-generated to help explain the treatment process.Effects & Progress
Effects & Progress
Shurink and Ultherapy are not the same treatment at two prices — they are two focused-ultrasound tools with different strengths. Shurink is the accessible Korean HIFU tier, delivering energy through 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm cartridges with a gentler feel that suits first-time and maintenance patients. Ultherapy is micro-focused ultrasound with real-time visualization, meaning the physician sees the exact layer being treated and can reach a deeper anchor for structural laxity. The right choice comes from reading how deep your looseness sits, not from the fee alone.
Fit follows the anatomy. Shurink is the sensible choice for budget-conscious patients, for a first HIFU experience, and for a maintenance cadence where results held 6-12 months are perfectly workable. Ultherapy earns its higher per-session investment when laxity is deeper along the jowls, when a patient wants the precision of imaging-guided treatment that sees the layer being treated, or when they would rather return less often for results reliably maintained 12-18 months. The same physician examines you and recommends the one that fits — and says so when the cheaper option is enough.
The clearest difference is what the physician can see. Ultherapy carries real-time visualization: an ultrasound image of the exact layer being treated appears on screen during the session, so energy is placed with imaging guidance rather than by feel and cartridge depth alone. That, plus a longer clinical track record and a deeper anchor, is what a patient pays more for. Shurink delivers reliable HIFU lifting at three fixed cartridge depths without on-screen imaging — capable and gentler, and often all that early laxity needs.
There is a sensible middle path many patients take: start with the accessible Shurink tier to address current looseness and maintain it, then move to Ultherapy's deeper, imaging-guided anchor later if structural laxity develops. Switching between them is straightforward because both are non-surgical ultrasound treatments on overlapping layers. The point of the consultation is not to sell the priciest option — the same physician who examines your laxity depth plans a staged approach around your budget and how your own skin responds, and neither treatment is a substitute for surgery.
Treatment Process
Shurink vs Ultherapy — 4 Steps to the Right Choice
※ Illustrative images are AI-generated to help explain the treatment process.
What the Shurink vs Ultherapy Choice Delivers in Gangnam — and How Each Result Builds
- Plain-spoken, depth-first recommendation: the same physician reads how deep your laxity sits and says plainly when Shurink at ₩150,000 ($108 USD) for 300 shots is enough and when Ultherapy's deeper anchor is worth the higher investment
- Two published prices to compare before booking: Shurink 300 shots is ₩150,000 ($108 USD) and Ultherapy 300 shots is ₩990,000 ($707 USD) at RE:BERRY Gangnam, with Ultherapy courses starting from 300 shots
- Real-time visualization with Ultherapy: the physician sees the exact tissue layer on screen while treating, placing energy with imaging guidance, not by feel and cartridge depth alone
- Accessible, gentler Korean HIFU with Shurink: 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm cartridges deliver reliable lifting at a budget-friendly maintenance tier that suits first-time and repeat patients
- Same physician from the laxity reading through delivery to your review — the Shurink vs Ultherapy decision in Gangnam is never handed off to another practitioner
- Genuine, MFDS-registered devices and sealed single-use cartridges verified in front of you, with your skin documented under standardized clinic lighting
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Session complete; mild redness or tenderness fades quickly — makeup, flying, and dinner reservations are all fine the same day with either Shurink or Ultherapy | |
| Early firmness from immediate collagen contraction settles in; the skin feels tauter to the touch, with Ultherapy's deeper anchor felt more distinctly than Shurink | |
| New collagen builds through the treated layers as the cheeks, jowls, and jawline look progressively firmer; response speed varies by individual and device | |
| The fullest lift is visible by months 2-3; in practical terms, Shurink results are maintained 6-12 months and Ultherapy 12-18 months before a maintenance session is considered |
Shurink vs Ultherapy vs Start-Cheap-Then-Upgrade — Choosing a Lifting Path in Gangnam
| Criteria | Shurink (RE:BERRY Gangnam) | Ultherapy (Micro-Focused Ultrasound) | Start Shurink, Upgrade to Ultherapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device origin | Accessible Korean HIFU (Classys Shurink Universe) | Imported flagship MFU-V (Merz) | Begin with the Korean tier, add the flagship if needed |
| Visualization | Depth set by cartridge, no on-screen imaging | Real-time visualization — sees the layer being treated | Cartridge-set first, imaging-guided on upgrade |
| Working depth | 1.5 / 3.0 / 4.5mm cartridges | Micro-focused to a deeper anchor at the SMAS layer | Surface layers first, deeper anchor when laxity warrants |
| Feel | Gentler feel, budget-friendly maintenance tier | Firmer sensation for the deeper anchor | Ease in gently, step up only if required |
| Result duration | Typically maintained 6-12 months | Typically maintained 12-18 months | Maintenance cadence now, less frequent sessions later |
| Best suited for | Budget-conscious, first HIFU, maintenance cadence | Deeper jowl laxity, imaging-guided precision, fewer sessions | Early laxity now with structural change anticipated |
| Fee anchor (300 shots) | ₩150,000 ($108 USD) | ₩990,000 ($707 USD), courses from 300 shots | Ultherapy per-100-shot ₩330,000 ($236 USD) |
Why This Matters
Shurink and Ultherapy are both focused-ultrasound lifting treatments, so they are not opposites — they are two tools at different points. Shurink is the accessible Korean HIFU tier that sets depth by 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm cartridges, while Ultherapy is micro-focused ultrasound with real-time visualization that lets the physician see the exact layer being treated and reach a deeper anchor. Neither replaces surgery, and at RE:BERRY Gangnam the physician chooses between them by reading how deep your laxity actually sits.
The 6x price gap between Shurink at ₩150,000 ($108 USD) and Ultherapy at ₩990,000 ($707 USD) for 300 shots is factual, not a discount: it reflects an imported flagship platform, real-time visualization, a deeper anchor, and a longer clinical track record. Seoul pricing is a large part of why medical travelers compare both here — the same session commonly runs materially higher in the US, Japan, and Australia — but the key point is that a higher fee only matters when your laxity actually needs the depth it buys.
Korea's average outpatient consultation runs just 4.3 minutes — the shortest in the OECD, against a 16.4-minute average — yet choosing between two HIFU platforms takes real examination time. RE:BERRY schedules 60-90 minute consultations, where the physician who reads your laxity depth also delivers every line and states clearly when the lower-priced option is enough.
October–December 2026 Promotions
Exclusive packages for international patients. Swipe to see all offers.
![RE:BERRY Gangnam Page 10 — Body Slimming Package: [Entry] Essence Slim, an introductory Body Onda package that delivers essential synergistic benefits for body shaping and contouring: Body V-RO HIFU 1,000 Shots + Body Onda 160kJ + Body InMode FX 15 Minute + Berry Slim 100cc ₩2,990,000 · [BEST · Doctor Recommended] Signature Contour, our No. 1 satisfaction-rated combined solution, designed to enhance both body contours and skin firmness at the same time: Body V-RO HIFU 1,500 Shots + Body Onda 320kJ + Body InMode FX 30 Minute + Berry Slim 150cc ₩3,990,000 · VAT excluded](https://cdn-gangnamaes.pages.dev/gangnam/promotion/en/gangnam-event-en-10.webp)
Published Shurink and Ultherapy Prices in Gangnam (Regular Rates, VAT Included)
Your Medical Director
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
- Medical Director, RE:BERRY Aesthetic Clinic Gangnam — Korean MOHW Medical License No.131644
- Manufacturer-appointed KOL invited to teach injection and energy-device technique to Korean peers
- Regular Member, Korean Academy of Aesthetic Medicine
- Co-manages every case with Dr. Yejin Oh (Korean MOHW Medical License No.144238)
- Featured in Authority Magazine (2026)
Medically reviewed by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, CEO / Medical Director, RE:BERRY
A Fourteen-Thousand-Square-Foot Hush Above Gangnam-daero
Step past the black gallery facade and the bustle of Gangnam-daero falls away. Fourteen thousand square feet of hushed corridors, marble installations, a cascading water feature and fully enclosed consultation suites — arranged so you rarely cross paths with another guest, because our reservation-only diary keeps every hour deliberately underbooked.
(1,322 m²)
Suites
KI Tower, Gangnam-daero
Station Exit 10
The Evidence Behind HIFU and Micro-Focused Ultrasound Lifting
Both Shurink and Ultherapy deliver high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), converging sound waves to create discrete thermal coagulation points at set depths within the skin and the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS). A foundational histologic study of microfocused ultrasound documented reproducible thermal coagulation zones confined to the targeted layer at 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm, with the overlying epidermis spared — the mechanism behind non-surgical lifting and the reason cartridge depth selection matters when choosing between the two platforms.
Laubach HJ, Makin IRS, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Manstein D. Intense focused ultrasound: evaluation of a new treatment modality for precise microcoagulation within the skin. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(5):727-734. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34196.x
Clinical outcomes support the lifting effect. A prospective study of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for brow lift measured a mean brow elevation of 1.7mm at 90 days in the majority of 93 subjects, and the visualization component — the same real-time imaging that distinguishes Ultherapy — let physicians confirm the target plane before energy delivery. A separate lower-face and neck study of microfocused ultrasound with visualization reported physician-assessed improvement in laxity in most of 35 subjects at 90 days, establishing the deeper-anchor indication that guides patient selection.
Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):262-269. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.039
Suh DH, Shin MK, Lee SJ, et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02094.x
Evidence in Asian skin matters for a Seoul clinic and informs how the physician frames the Shurink versus Ultherapy choice. A Korean split-face comparison of two HIFU devices found comparable objective lifting between platforms with differing patient-reported comfort, consistent with Shurink's gentler-feel positioning, while a review of focused-ultrasound lifting confirmed that both modalities stimulate neocollagenesis without downtime yet neither substitutes for surgical rhytidectomy in advanced laxity. This is why the physician at RE:BERRY Gangnam screens laxity depth first: surface looseness responds to the accessible Korean HIFU tier, while deeper structural sagging is where the imaging-guided, deeper-anchor platform earns its higher fee.
Park JY, Lee EG, Yoon MS, Lee HJ. The efficacy and safety of combined microfocused ultrasound and focused radiofrequency for facial skin tightening. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(4):531-537.
Questions International Guests Ask About Shurink vs Ultherapy in Gangnam
Is the cheaper Shurink enough, or do I really need Ultherapy?
Often Shurink is enough — at ₩150,000 ($108 USD) for 300 shots it handles surface looseness and maintenance well. Ultherapy at ₩990,000 ($707 USD) earns its higher fee only when your laxity sits deeper along the jowls. At RE:BERRY Gangnam the physician reads your depth and gives you a clear answer on which one fits.
What is the visualization difference between Shurink and Ultherapy?
Ultherapy has real-time visualization — the physician sees the exact tissue layer on screen while treating, placing energy with imaging guidance. Shurink sets depth by 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm cartridges without on-screen imaging.
| Feature | Shurink | Ultherapy |
|---|---|---|
| Sees the layer | No, cartridge-set | Yes, real-time |
| Depth control | 1.5/3.0/4.5mm | Imaging-guided anchor |
Which hurts more, Shurink or Ultherapy?
Most patients describe Shurink as the gentler feel, which is part of why it anchors the accessible maintenance tier. Ultherapy reaches a deeper anchor and is felt more distinctly. At RE:BERRY Gangnam the physician adjusts intensity to your comfort throughout, and the sensation eases between lines with either device.
How long do Shurink vs Ultherapy results last?
As a rule of thumb, Shurink results are maintained 6-12 months and Ultherapy 12-18 months.
| Feature | Shurink | Ultherapy |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 6-12 months | 12-18 months |
| Cadence | Maintenance rhythm | Less frequent |
Why is Ultherapy about 6x the price of Shurink for the same 300 shots?
The gap is factual: Shurink 300 shots is ₩150,000 ($108 USD) and Ultherapy 300 shots is ₩990,000 ($707 USD) because Ultherapy is an imported flagship with real-time visualization, a deeper anchor, and a longer track record.
| Device | 300 shots |
|---|---|
| Shurink | ₩150,000 ($108 USD) |
| Ultherapy | ₩990,000 ($707 USD) |
How does Seoul pricing for these compare with the US or Japan?
Seoul runs materially below typical US and Japan pricing for both HIFU platforms, drawing medical travelers to compare them here. Korean clinics also treat far higher energy-device volumes than most Western practices, so the same Shurink or Ultherapy session at RE:BERRY Gangnam is more accessible than comparable US clinics while the physician keeps the recommendation grounded in your anatomy.
Can I switch between Shurink and Ultherapy later?
Yes — switching is straightforward because both are non-surgical ultrasound treatments on overlapping layers. Many patients start with Shurink at ₩150,000 ($108 USD) for maintenance, then step up to Ultherapy if deeper laxity appears; the Ultherapy per-100-shot rate is ₩330,000 ($236 USD). The same physician at RE:BERRY Gangnam plans the staged path.
How does the maintenance math work between the two?
It depends on cadence, not just sticker price: Shurink's shorter hold means more frequent accessible sessions, while Ultherapy's longer hold means fewer, higher-investment sessions. The physician at RE:BERRY Gangnam frames this around your budget and how your own skin responds, so the plan fits your rhythm rather than a fixed schedule.
Who actually decides which one I get?
The same physician who examines your laxity depth decides with you — not a coordinator and not the price tag. At RE:BERRY Gangnam that physician reads whether your looseness is surface or structural, recommends Shurink or Ultherapy accordingly, and tells you plainly when the cheaper option is enough. See the Shurink page for device detail.
Do Shurink or Ultherapy replace a surgical facelift?
No — neither Shurink nor Ultherapy is a substitute for surgery. Both stimulate new collagen and lift non-surgically without downtime, but advanced structural sagging responds better to a surgical lift. The physician at RE:BERRY Gangnam screens for this first and will say when an ultrasound treatment is not the right tool for your degree of laxity.
Is there downtime — can I fly home the same day after either?
No true downtime with either treatment — mild redness or tenderness fades quickly and there is no wound, so makeup, flights, and sightseeing are all fine the same day. That makes both Shurink and Ultherapy at RE:BERRY Gangnam easy to fit into a short Seoul itinerary, even a 2-day stopover.
How many days in Seoul do I need for a Shurink or Ultherapy session?
One visit is enough — consultation and treatment fit into a single appointment, and there is no recovery period afterward. Many international guests at RE:BERRY Gangnam book their Shurink or Ultherapy session early in a 3-5 day Seoul trip and continue sightseeing the same day, with the physician confirming the plan on arrival.
What follow-up do I get after I return home?
RE:BERRY Gangnam includes 90 days of WhatsApp follow-up in English, reviewing your progress photos as the lift from your Shurink or Ultherapy session develops over 2-3 months. A free pre-departure review is scheduled before you fly, and the same physician who treated you reads your progress personally — it is never handed off to staff.
Why choose RE:BERRY Gangnam for the Shurink vs Ultherapy decision?
RE:BERRY publishes both rates openly — Shurink 300 shots ₩150,000 ($108 USD) and Ultherapy 300 shots ₩990,000 ($707 USD) — opens the sealed genuine cartridge in front of you, and keeps one physician on your case from the laxity reading through review. Devices are MFDS-registered and interpreters cover 5 languages on-site. See the Ultherapy page.
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Book Your Shurink vs Ultherapy Consultation in Gangnam
Send your skin concerns and travel dates to RE:BERRY on WhatsApp — a coordinator replies as soon as possible with both published rates in writing: Shurink 300 shots ₩150,000 ($108 USD) and Ultherapy 300 shots ₩990,000 ($707 USD). The physician who reads your laxity depth recommends the one that fits and will say outright when the cheaper option is enough — nothing is scheduled until you confirm.
Why Tens of Thousands of Foreign Patients Are Choosing This Gangnam Clinic — Business Wire, 2026-04-13
Numbers That Tell Our Story
Real procedures performed.
Brand-Authenticated Equipment & Training
Our doctors are certified by Korea's top dermatological societies
Latest from Our Instagram
Real treatments, patient reactions, and behind-the-scenes from RE:BERRY.
Tap any video for sound & fullscreen
What our patients say
Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile
I had a really nice experience at Reberry Clinic Gangnam. I received a Hydrafacial treatment, and the whole process was very comfortable. The staff were kind and explained everything clearly, and the clinic itself felt clean and relaxing. I also loved the interior — the clinic felt very clean, elegant, and luxurious, w...
I had such an amazing experience at this clinic! The clinic itself is absolutely stunning the design is beautiful, elegant, and luxurious, and the service is truly top-notch. Everything was so well organized, and I felt very comfortable from the moment I walked in.
I had a Korean filler treatment to reduce my nasolabia...
i had a good time having the Juvelook treatment!
It was my first time in Korea, all the Doctor & team are bery helpful. Dr. Ian & cheong a lee(jenny) are really helpful.
I understand more about my skin.
The clinic is calm, welcoming.
there are many activities i didn’t expect to find in a beauty clinic; phot...
So happy to found the beauty clinic in Korea that very inclusive and Muslim friendly. They have a prayer space for muslim and they prepare a female doctor for me. The clinic is so comfortable with aesthetic design make me feel relaxed. The doctor and the staff are very professional and helpful so all of the procedure r...
As someone who has struggled with acne since middle school, I decided to stop here during a layover in Seoul and was amazed by the treatment.
Firstly, the environment is elegant and peaceful. Feels very luxurious and the treatment from staff was as such as well. Speaking of staff, they were extremely professional, car...
Book Your Personalized Consultation
Share your details and our multilingual team will contact you as soon as possible through your preferred messenger.
- ✓ Free online skin consultation with a doctor
- ✓ Personalized treatment plan & pricing
- ✓ Airport pickup available only at the Incheon Airport branch
- ✓ 5-language support (EN/ZH-CN/ZH-TW/JA/ES)
- ✓ Response as soon as possible via your preferred messenger
Science HIFU and micro-focused ultrasound lifting — peer-reviewed references
Non-surgical ultrasound lifting rests on more than a decade of peer-reviewed evidence, beginning with proof of its mechanism: Laubach (2008) documented reproducible thermal coagulation zones confined to targeted depths of 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm with the epidermis spared. Clinical outcomes followed — a rater-blinded cohort of 93 subjects measured a mean 1.7mm brow elevation at 90 days under microfocused ultrasound with visualization (Alam 2010), and a dedicated Asian-skin study confirmed both clinical and histologic tightening with sustained collagen change (Suh 2011). A combined microfocused-ultrasound protocol study established comparable objective lifting across platforms with differing comfort profiles (Park 2017). Together these define why the physician selects between the accessible Korean HIFU tier and the imaging-guided, deeper-anchor platform by reading laxity depth, and why neither is presented as a substitute for surgery.
- Laubach HJ, Makin IRS, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Manstein D. Intense focused ultrasound: evaluation of a new treatment modality for precise microcoagulation within the skin. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(5):727-734. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34196.x
- Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):262-269. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.039
- Suh DH, Shin MK, Lee SJ, et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02094.x
- Park JY, Lee EG, Yoon MS, Lee HJ. The efficacy and safety of combined microfocused ultrasound and focused radiofrequency for facial skin tightening. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(4):531-537.
- Fabi SG. Noninvasive skin tightening: focus on new ultrasound techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:47-52. doi:10.2147/CCID.S69118
These references shape how the Shurink versus Ultherapy choice is made at RE:BERRY's Gangnam aesthetic clinic: a laxity-depth reading by the treating physician before any energy is delivered; cartridge selection at 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5mm for the accessible Korean HIFU tier, or real-time visualization to confirm the target plane for the deeper-anchor platform; and standardized-lighting photographic follow-up through the 2-3 month collagen remodeling window under the same licensed physician, who states honestly when the accessible option is enough and when it is not. This information is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice.
How to Find RE:BERRY Gangnam
2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10. B1–B2, KI Tower — the building with the all-black entrance you can't miss.
RE:BERRY Gangnam Aesthetic Clinic
B1–B2, KI Tower, 69-gil 8, Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul
서울시 서초구 강남대로69길 8, 지하1·2층 (KI타워)